We are mid “Droughtlander” and anxiously awaiting a few casting announcements. Brianna and Roger haven’t been cast yet or if they have there hasn’t been an official announcement. As anxious as I am for a peek at who they have chosen, I have to say I’m glad they are taking their time choosing these two. Getting these two characters right is a big deal! They are important to the rest of the books and hopefully, to the rest of the series.
I’ve talked to very few book fans who weren’t half in love with Roger. He’s very likable and an interesting mixture of strength and vulnerability. He is every bit as emotionally intelligent as Jamie and I’ve always felt that he “gets” Claire. In fact, I’ve felt they have a lot in common. He is patient, forgiving, caring, smart, strong, and capable of loving unconditionally. He stood up to Jamie and earned his respect. That fact alone tells you that Roger is a man worth admiration and respect.
Then there’s Brianna… she tends to inspire a variety of fan responses. Some fans love her and some hate her.
I’ve always felt that Claire and Jamie were pretty easy to figure out. It isn’t hard to understand what motivates them. Claire is a kind woman who cares about the people around her. Jamie does the best he can with the gifts and people he believes God has entrusted him. I’ve come to see their daughter as a bit harder to figure out. I’ve come to see her as complex.
I once had a conversation with some fans where I mentioned the fact that Brianna was probably more difficult to write because of her being inserted into the story as a baby. Diana had to start from scratch! Add to the difficulty of creating a persona for an already established character, the fact that she is the child of two very strong and well-loved characters and you get fan expectations. In fact, one of the fans I was discussing Brianna with said she believed “Diana got lazy with Brianna’s character. Just because she was hard to write doesn’t give her permission to do a poor job.” SAY WHAT?!
Further questioning revealed that this fan didn’t like Brianna as a character. I believe the words she used were selfish and bratty. I can remember at the time feeling a little incensed that someone would call Diana a lazy writer. I still marvel at how she connects every little detail, every character to the on-going story. You better remember what she writes because somewhere in one of the eight books those details and characters are going to come into play. Lazy? Have you seen the size of those books? And how many best sellers has she written? And whose books are so full of entertaining characters and plots that they made it a TV series? Lazy? Soooo not buying that one. But, when I was thinking of the casting of Brianna for the show that conversation came back to mind; selfish and bratty. Was she? If not, then why would someone think that I wondered? Did Diana try to make her difficult to like?
As you probably know, Diana Gabaldon often shares insight into her writing process. She once said that when she writes she is usually dealing with three types of characters; onions, mushrooms, and nuts. Claire and Jamie are considered onions, they are multiple-layered and with each new book she gets a chance to add to the layers. Lord John is an example of a mushroom, he just sort of pops up fully formed. Then there are the hard nuts, characters like Brianna who HAVE to be written because they already have a place in the story.
So, I started thinking about how Diana chose to write Brianna. The reader might expect that the daughter of these two characters would be pretty wonderful, perfect in fact. Given how wonderful her parents were it would be reasonable to expect Diana to write a character that reflects the best of their character traits. But, Diana is pretty good at not giving us the usual and the to be expected in her characters and story. Brianna should be a character that is a perfect blend of Jamie and Claire…to quote Diana, ” says who?”
I think Diana made Brianna unique. She IS a great mixture of the two of them, but there is the key word…mixture. Jamie and Claire each brought unique skills and aptitudes and personalities to the moment of Brianna’s conception. But, like when you mix vanilla, flour, sugar, and eggs together and then bake it you have something entirely new…cake. Jamie and Claire are some great genetic ingredients, but sometimes just a little too much of one thing and not another can change the taste of the whole thing! And then you still have to have the right temperature and bake it the right amount of time, etc.
So, I believe Diana decided that Brianna would be a product of both nature and nurture just like the rest of us. The fact that she is a child of the fifties and sixties in America really should impact who she is a person, as does being raised by Frank and then finding out he wasn’t her father. Her mother broke through gender barriers to become a doctor in a time of emerging feminism, that had to have made an impression. In a way, Bri going back through the stones would have been an even harder adjustment than what her mother experienced. At least Claire had some understanding of how to be the ” little woman” or what it meant to be submissive to men. I dare say Brianna never saw her mother playing the submissive role.
I’ve heard fans say they don’t like how she treats Roger. What I’ve seen is that she expects to be treated as an equal. She sticks up for herself and her needs. Maybe this is where people get the idea she is selfish and bratty? But, isn’t that what we say we all want for our daughters, the ability to stand up for themselves? Brianna knows her own worth and expects to be treated as worthy of respect and fair treatment. Roger, bless his heart, believes she is worthy too! She isn’t easy, but he’s up for the challenge. It takes a strong man to love a strong woman.
So, what kind of person did Diana decide to create in the character of Brianna. I believe Brianna is the modern woman; she is
in touch with her own needs
not willing to settle
Yep, the nut didn’t fall far from either tree! Can’t wait to meet her on the screen!